12 Comments
Dec 26, 2022·edited Dec 27, 2022Liked by Jim Jensen

I thank you & David Martin for your diligence. There’s much to uncover and in my opinion there’s no question that the entire event was long planned (see YouTube documentary by Paul Schreyer, “Pandemic Simulations”) & the pandemic was wholly faked (see Denis Rancourt’s papers and especially, recent interviews such as with “Jerm Warfare” podcast).

Why, it must be asked, would anyone wish to fake a pandemic?

Obviously, I can only speculate, but it must be admitted that it prepares the world for The Great Reset, and aligned to the UN2030 SDGs, far too well to be coincidental.

I don’t buy “money” alone as the motive. Too much by way of value destruction would have happened to owners of certain asset classes. In any case, the perpetrators by definition include the owners of Uber capital and assets. That said, there’s been a redistribution the likes of which we’ve never seen before & many have become wealthy. That was a welcome side effect for the perpetrators, I believe.

It was & is primarily about control.

Prior to the fake pandemic, almost all information was already controlled, I now realise. Adjacent to my own career field, pharmaceuticals R&D, the field of vaccines as a class has been the subject of monstrous deception for a very long time. Things weren’t OK until 2020. They’d been broken for decades.

The extent of control intended is nothing like anything that’s happened in the world previously.

If the perpetrators succeed in installing their vision, every individual will controlled at the level of almost every transaction: not only buying & selling, but crossing any regulated threshold. Imagine a world in which every threshold was regulated. That’s the world they intend for us.

If I can envisage it, they have better plans yet & a handful of pathways to accomplishing it.

All that’s required is s a common format, interoperable, editable, mandatory digital ID, accompanied by cashless CBDCs. The controllers of the databases and algorithms will define the edges of each of our digital prisons.

At first, I had seen “vaccination” as a way to on-board everyone to their unique, digital ID. It might still be. Yet if that was the intention, why not simply inject everyone with physiological saline? I knew very early that their basic design motifs meant that harms were unavoidable. And all leading Biopharma players were making the same set of decisions (& alleged “mistakes”: be assured that these people are smart. Whatever they’ve done, it’s no mistake, but entirely deliberate).

No: they had additional objectives, and nothing fits all the observations so well as depopulation.

I am surprised to find that I’d never previously heard of MCAM. Has anyone else? I’d appreciate reassurance that this is mostly my blind spot. I was heavily involved in patenting, unusually so for a biologist. In pharma, the bulk of the patents were for “composition of matter” clams, which medicinal chemists would largely draft, along with formulations, devices & “methods” patents. I liaised closely for years with talented patent attorneys, both in big pharma for 25y and later in biotech for more than a decade. I was rarely an inventor, and even them mostly the weakest types of patent protection: the “method of use” claim.

How can I not even have heard of MCAM? That perturbs me a little without being able to put my finger on anything. I think more than the specific example, what I’m experiencing is a growing realisation that I knew even less than I already realised.

Whatever, MCAM surely has a very large staff. Even now, AI isn’t good enough to sift through the millions of newly filed patent clams. That means people are doing the sifting. Even experts frequently disagree with which of a series of “nested claims” will be granted & how resilient to legal challenges on alleged infringements, lack of novelty or inventive step they might ultimately be. It’s also very slow work, inherently. The inventor is required to cite relevant “prior art”. While that is of assistance to the examiner, they also need to run searches to exclude the possibility that the inventor hasn’t missed important prior clams, granted or not, because even filed, published clams, which were subsequently dropped or disallowed, create a litter of “prior art”, making a clam for no celery and most particularly, inventive step harder and harder.

I don’t dispute David’s expert assessments about patents in the field of covid19 and related topics, but this void in my bare awareness of the existence of such an important & influential organisation, coupled with the strong direction we’re fed as a result of MCAMs work, is prompting me to consider the possibility that there is yet much more complexity yet to appreciate.

Expand full comment
Jan 26, 2023Liked by Jim Jensen

Thanks for giving the 🌎 FACTS. Seeing govs push ridiculous State Narratives, like Canada blaming Flu 💉 for Strokes & 'Fact Checked Scientific Study declaring EGGS are causing all the Blood Clots. We now KNOW it is Obama Bioweapon Fauci moved to Wuhan China. And WEF controlled countries /Biden admin TRICKED or FORCED us into injecting mNRA gene modifying Bioweapon - to END USA

Expand full comment
Dec 26, 2022Liked by Jim Jensen

Watch David E Martin. Follow the money 2/2020 I believe.

He knew

He told us

Hardly anyone listened.

He convinced me though, I no longer feared or fell for the Government Narrative of lies for control.

And sure as Hell wasn’t trusting a vax made by the same criminals

Expand full comment