How an Evil Cabal Faked a Pandemic | Part II

Part II | Time Travel or Racketeering?

Don’t miss Part I where we cover Dr. Martin’s history and the invention of the SARS virus.

New Day, Same Virus

Dr. Martin spends a good portion of his interview with Fuellmich trying to relate the idea that there is nothing “new” about the SARS-COV-2 virus. This is important because we heard incessantly at the beginning of the COVID scare about the “novel” SARS coronavirus. This is a very difficult point to make because we have all been programmed to accept the existence of a new virus.

In November 2021, Dr. Martin spoke at the WeCanAct Liberty Conference in Salt Lake City, UT, and said to the public, “I cannot be on stage anywhere without asking you first and foremost: Do not participate in the propaganda of this conspiracy. Number one: there is no SARS Coronavirus 2. There is a bioweapon that in 1999 was paid for by Anthony Fauci and was patented by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.”

The Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID) is a scientific primary source established in 2008 that provides open access to genomic data of influenza viruses and the coronavirus named in the COVID-19 scare.

M-CAM took the reportedly novel genetic sequences that were uploaded to GISAID and reviewed those against the 4,000+ patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. The gene sequences are not represented in any digital form that makes it easy to do this comparison, Dr. Martin explained.

“We literally had to take images of submitted typed papers and then code those in to do our own assessment. You cannot do this on the EPO’s patent site. You cannot do this with WIPO data from Geneva. You cannot do this with the US Patent Office data.

“You actually have to go in and reconstruct the actual gene sequences by hand and then you compare them to what has been uploaded on the public servers and that's where you find that the question of novelty is something that was not addressed. This was a manufactured illusion.”

The gene sequence that was reviewed was reportedly isolated as a “novel” coronavirus, indicated as such by the ICTV (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) of the World Health Organization. What they found were over 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a “novel” coronavirus is a fallacy.

There was no “novel” coronavirus. There are countless very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded. But there was no single identified novel coronavirus at all. Some of the sequences were found in patent records as early as 1999.

According to Dr. Martin, if you take what was reported to be “novel,” you find 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019, which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-COV-2, specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the H3 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein.

“There was no outbreak of SARS.” Dr. Martin asserts, “because we had engineered all of the elements of that. And by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium, that said that the SARS Coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Baric, it was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation. Seventy-three times. There is nothing new in this. Nothing. Zero. Seventy-three patents on everything clinically novel. Seventy-three. All issued before 2019.”

The Patent Shell Game

In his presentation, Dr. Martin carefully traces the history of the gene sequencing patents to make some important points. The main point is that the last 3 years has not been a public health crisis, it’s been a giant racket to make money. The CDC and the NIH are regulatory capture for the pharmaceutical industry that no longer serve the public interests. This is shown by the patent shell game played just before the start of the alleged pandemic.

US Patent 7279327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung-targeting coronavirus, was transferred from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institute of Health in 2018. This is strange because under the Bayh-Dole Act, the US Gvernment already has what is called “march-in rights.” That means if the US Government paid for research, they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand.

So why, on the one patent required to develop the Vaccine Research Institute's mandate, was ownership transferred? Because when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID, and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine, it was a month before an “outbreak” ever happened. Dr. Martin says he will always call it an “alleged outbreak” because there is no evidence that an outbreak of anything new occurred.

It’s very difficult to get your mind across the chasm from having 100s of millions of “cases” and millions of “deaths” to the understanding that nothing new was released into the population.

Time Travel or Racketeering?

Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with respect to the development of a vaccine in March of 2019. During that month, for reasons that are not transparent, they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings to specifically refer to an “accidental or deliberate release” of coronavirus.

Amending rejected patent filings is unusual behavior, but what makes these amendments even more bizarre is the inserted wording “accidental or deliberate release.” This is the same phrase that occurs in the September 2019 Annual Report for the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. This report foresees “a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released.”

The GPMB report warns that donors and countries must “commit and identify timelines for financing and development of a universal influenza vaccine, broad-spectrum antivirals, and targeted therapeutics” by September 2020.

In other words, in March 2019 Moderna amended four failed patent applications to begin the process of  coronavirus vaccine development 9 months before SARS-COV-2 began to allegedly be detected in the population.

In November, Moderna entered into a cooperative research and development agreement with UNC Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein put inside a lipid nanoparticle. So, they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen.

From all this history, we can see that either we have a RICO case of racketeering and collusion to defraud the public on a massive scale, or we have time travel. But we consistently see that people who should not have been able to know about things before they happened knew about them.

What About Those Who Died from COVID?

Listen to a few of these statements made by Dr. Martin in his presentation and try to get your head around them.

“There is no such thing as an Alpha, or a Beta, or Gamma, or a Delta variant.”

“If you look at GISAID, what you'll find is that there has been no ability to identify any clinically altered gene sequence which has then a clinically expressed variation.”

“We do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever.”

“There has not been a single paper published by anyone that has actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November of 2019.”

“We do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclade SARS-COV-2 has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.”

“There is no, and I'm going to repeat this, there is no evidence that the Delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else on GISAID.”

The key to what Dr. Martin is saying is that there is no “clinical” distinction between the gene sequences that have been reported to be new and the coronavirus gene sequences that were already circulating in the population. This means that any differences that do exist could not be detected in a clinic using a test.

This is critically important because “fact checkers” have repeatedly stated that the “novel” coronavirus, designated as SARS-COV-2 is distinct from the CDC patent.

But, according to Dr. Martin, “if you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005, and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89% to 99% of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what's called the novel subclade of SARS-COV-2.”

It Was More of a Casedemic

A couple other facts that point to the fabrication of this entire COVID scare were surfaced by Dr. Martin in an interview with Stew Peters published a few days after the interview with Fuellmich.

During the first two weeks of January 2020, there were various gene sequences uploaded to GISAID from multiple locations. The first gene sequence alleged to be the novel coronavirus was uploaded on December 20th, 2019, which predates the first alleged patient.

A Chinese publication on January 4, 2020, reported 41 cases of a virus that wasn’t “isolated” until the following week. Those 41 people allegedly presented as a cluster of pneumonia cases. What happened with pneumonia? It is still not considered a symptom of COVID by the CDC. Yet all 41 of those “pneumonia” cases were reported to be caused by the same pathogen.

Remember: the people who patented the SARS coronavirus also patented the RT-PCR test which “detects” it. The world was flooded with PCR tests that were designed to look for fragments of gene sequences (if that.) Testing was mandated. People who got the sniffles were tested and told they have COVID. People without any symptoms were tested and told they had COVID. Anyone who entered the hospital for any reason was tested and told they had COVID.  So if anything bad happened while you were in the hospital, it was of course attributed to COVID.

We’ve known since at least 6 months into the COVID scare that the “gold standard” RT-PCR tests can produce wildly inaccurate results, especially when the cycle threshold is jacked up so high.

The hated Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the RT-PCR test and enemy of Anthony Fauci who conveniently died just before the COVID scare, Kary Mullis, publicly insisted that the tests should never be used for diagnosing viral illness.  In August 2020, the New York Times published a rare (for them) counter-narrative exposé on the tests where they showed from lab results that the PCR tests can return incorrect results up to over 80% of the time.

And because the PCR tests are so expensive, many places resorted to the less reliable lateral flow test which was also shown to misdiagnose “between 20% and 81% of positive cases in different settings,” according to Imperial College London.

And because getting these tests is a hassle, there’s now an app for that. You no longer need to see a doctor or nurse to be tested. You can conveniently let an app analyze your voice and have a result in 30 seconds. It doesn’t get any more scientific than that, eh?

If you’re still unsure about the accuracy of the RT-PCR tests google “CDC data PCR test accuracy.” Your results will be swarming with “fact checkers” trying to guide you back to the reservation.

But even these articles are all hype. To say that that a test failed to diagnose properly assumes they were being used properly and that the thing they were looking for is a thing.

“The problem is,” according to Dr. Martin, “because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a compositing process, it's what we call in mathematics an interleaving, we don't have any point of reference to actually know whether or not the thing we're looking at is, in fact, distinct in either a clinical or even genomic sense.”

In a more recent presentation, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich summarizes the disaster by stressing, “without the PCR test—without the misuse of the PCR test, there wouldn't be any cases. Without the cases, there wouldn't be a public health emergency of international concern.”

It Was All Media Hype

Everything we heard about the “pandemic” was media hype. It was collusion by government, scientists, doctors, and the media to make billions of dollars selling tests to convince the world that everyone needs to take regular shots to be “safe” so they can make billions of dollars on a known-to-be-dangerous injection of a gene sequence that instructs human cells to synthesize a lethal pathogen known as the S1 spike protein.

Peter Daszak the zoologist and head of EcoHealth Alliance, who was independently corroborating the Chinese “non-lab leak, non-theory,” is on record in 2015 saying, “Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis we need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process.”

Dr. Martin summarizes what we have experienced over the last 3 years by saying, “This was intentional, via weaponization of spike proteins, to inject into people [a pathogen] to get them addicted to a pan-coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that's ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring.”

Summary

Is it too far to conclude that a group of people are evil and mad enough to wreck the world in a bid to sell billions of dollars worth of a treatment that we are instructed to take repeatedly forever?

Let’s see. Just within the last 100 years, a group of people unleashed WWI which claimed over 15 million lives in a land grab.

Twenty years later, another group of people ignited WWII which resulted in the deaths of over 70 million people.

Twenty years after that a group of people in China were responsible for starving and slaughtering over 65 million of their own citizens.

Very few perpetrators were punished for the utter destruction of the last century. On the contrary, in many cases their leaders are still revered as saviors by people across the world because of the success of their hype and propaganda.

In retrospect, it takes almost no effort to admit a cabal in this century conspired using the threat of death to fabricate demand for their products in a plot to enrich themselves at the expense of a fearful and obedient population.